Court Restricts Police Use of GPS Tracking Devices
A federal appeals court has ruled that law enforcement authorities in the United States must get a warrant before hiding a global positioning system (GPS) tracker on a suspect's car. The ruling clarifies an issue left unanswered by a previous Supreme Court verdict.
The legal confusion followed a high-profile case involving a suspected drug dealer who was tried and convicted after police tracked his movements using a GPS device attached to his Jeep.
The man took the case to the Supreme Court, which overturned his conviction because it found that much of the evidence was inadmissible. The reason: police did not have a warrant.
The verdict merely confirmed that in the eyes of the law, using a tracking device does count as carrying out a search, something that is heavily restricted by the Fourth Amendment.
However, it didn't clearly establish that, in the future, police must acquire a warrant before using a GPS tracking device.
Ruling Clarifies Fourth Amendment
Now, a new case has led to a ruling on that issue.
It involves three brothers suspected of a series of store thefts. Police put a GPS tracker on their car and then stopped and searched it shortly after a local theft. Although police say they found stolen items, a series of appeals has led to that evidence being ruled inadmissible and the brothers' convictions being overturned.
This week a federal appeals court confirmed that decision. It said that, as a legal principle and a general rule, police must get a warrant before using GPS trackers. (Source: computerworld.com)
Court Rejects 'Same As Search' Argument
The court explicitly rejected the argument that using GPS trackers should be covered by the same rules that apply to physically searching a vehicle. Police do have the right to search vehicles without a warrant if they have probable cause to do so.
The thinking behind that rule is that there's too great a danger of a car being long gone by the time the paperwork is done.
According to the court, that's not relevant to the issue of using GPS trackers. It said that using a tracker gives police far more information over a much longer time than they would get from a physical search. (Source: washingtonpost.com)
This week's ruling only affects the use of physical devices, such as GPS trackers. It doesn't affect the ongoing legal debate about law enforcement officials' use of phone company records to track people's movements through their smartphones.
Most popular articles
- Which Processor is Better: Intel or AMD? - Explained
- How to Prevent Ransomware in 2018 - 10 Steps
- 5 Best Anti Ransomware Software Free
- How to Fix: Computer / Network Infected with Ransomware (10 Steps)
- How to Fix: Your Computer is Infected, Call This Number (Scam)
- Scammed by Informatico Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Smart PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Right PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by PC / Web Network Experts? Here's What to Do
- How to Fix: Windows Update Won't Update
- Explained: Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?
- Explained: VPN vs Proxy; What's the Difference?
- Explained: Difference Between VPN Server and VPN (Service)
- Forgot Password? How to: Reset Any Password: Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10
- How to: Use a Firewall to Block Full Screen Ads on Android
- Explained: Absolute Best way to Limit Data on Android
- Explained: Difference Between Dark Web, Deep Net, Darknet and More
- Explained: If I Reset Windows 10 will it Remove Malware?
My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in cyber crimes (sextortion / blackmail / tech support scams) with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.