4M use Facebook Safety Check after Paris Attack
Facebook says more than four million Parisians used its "Safety Check" feature to reassure friends they were safe after last weeks terrorist attacks in Paris. But the company has been forced to explain why it did not activate the feature for bombings in Beirut.
The Safety Check feature was introduced to help people quickly and easily let others know they are safe during a disaster situation. The idea is to help cut down the number of phone calls and text messages sent asking if somebody is OK, or to let others know they are OK. That in turn is designed to reduce the pressures on local phone networks at a time when they often come under strain.
One-Click Update To Reassure Friends
Whenever Facebook activates the feature, any user who is logged in to the service and is in the vicinity of a disaster gets an on screen prompt asking if they are safe. The user can then either tap an "I'm safe" button or alternatively an "I'm not in the area" button.
Once this happens, the user's Facebook friends get a notification that the person is safe. They can also access a list of all friends shown as being in the area, divided into those who have marked they are safe and those yet to respond.
Facebook says 4.1 million users used the Safety Check feature to update their status after the Paris attacks. It's not clear exactly how many were prompted to use the tool, though around 12 million people live in Paris. Altogether, 360 million different users saw an update saying at least one person was safe. (Source: washingtonpost.com)
First Time For Man-Made Situation
While it's the fifth time the feature has been activated, it's the first time it's been done for something other than a natural disaster. The move has prompted some criticism from users who asked why Facebook did not activate its reassurance feature for two bombings in Beirut the same day, which killed 43 people.
Although some critics believed this was a sign of a "Western-bias," Facebook says that wasn't the case. Instead it argues that the feature will only work properly with one-off events rather than in ongoing conflicts or epidemics. It notes that in those situations which have no clearly defined start or end, "it's impossible to know when someone is truly 'safe'." (Source: facebook.com)
What's Your Opinion?
Was Facebook right to use the feature for a terrorist attack rather than solely for natural disasters? Should it extend the feature to other attacks, even when part of an ongoing conflict? Would you be reassured if friends could update you with "Safety Check" or could you become unduly concerned about people who might simply have lost Internet access but are unharmed.
Most popular articles
- Which Processor is Better: Intel or AMD? - Explained
- How to Prevent Ransomware in 2018 - 10 Steps
- 5 Best Anti Ransomware Software Free
- How to Fix: Computer / Network Infected with Ransomware (10 Steps)
- How to Fix: Your Computer is Infected, Call This Number (Scam)
- Scammed by Informatico Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Smart PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Right PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by PC / Web Network Experts? Here's What to Do
- How to Fix: Windows Update Won't Update
- Explained: Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?
- Explained: VPN vs Proxy; What's the Difference?
- Explained: Difference Between VPN Server and VPN (Service)
- Forgot Password? How to: Reset Any Password: Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10
- How to: Use a Firewall to Block Full Screen Ads on Android
- Explained: Absolute Best way to Limit Data on Android
- Explained: Difference Between Dark Web, Deep Net, Darknet and More
- Explained: If I Reset Windows 10 will it Remove Malware?
My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in cyber crimes (sextortion / blackmail / tech support scams) with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.
Comments
A very good use of technology
Stepping back and looking at how this technology works is quite impressive. As for whether or not it should have been used in other conflicts is difficult to say. One idea might be to have users enroll in 'ongoing conflict' feed, where they can update their status for every bombing that takes place in certain parts of the world. Even so, it may be difficult to algorithmically ascertain when such an event takes place - especially if there is no wide-spread media coverage online.
Facebook Safety Check
Facebook was right to use 'Safety Check' in the circumstance that is not 'the norm'. Persons in areas of known high risk can, and do, have methods of updating their status for specific events.
Safety check?
I don't understand the problem here. Why can't anyone post a message on their page "I AM SAFE - DATE:TIME"? OR, am I too old to understand the technology here?