Congress Challenges Cellphone Radiation Limits
A Congressional agency has told regulators it is time to review the rules governing cellphone radiation. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) said existing rules might not be doing an effective job of measuring the risk to users.
The GAO acts as support staff for Congress and also carries out audits to check that government departments are spending money effectively.
Three members of Congress recently asked the GAO to look into the way the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates public safety with respect to cellphones.
Cancer, Health Risks Not a GAO Concern
The GAO's year-long investigation into the issue was not designed to decide whether or not cellphone radiation actually increases the chances that users become more susceptible to health problems such as cancer.
Instead, it was intended merely to check on the FCC's current system for monitoring cellphone manufacturers and for setting safe cellphone radiation levels, and to see that it works well enough. (Source: gao.gov)
The existing limits on radiation levels were set back in 1996. Today, the Government Accountability Office says they may now be outdated. It has asked the Federal Communications Commission to review two specific areas of current regulations.
Cellphone Radiation Limits Low, Crude
First, the GAO reports the FCC may be able to raise the allowable radiation limits, since several other international bodies have set higher limits in recent years. Thus, the raw numbers the FCC currently uses may be unnecessarily strict on manufacturers.
However, the same report also says the way manufacturers must measure radiation energy may need to change.
Companies currently assume there's no radiation risk at all when people use hands-free kits such as Bluetooth headsets. But according to the GAO, this assumes a cellphone will be on a table or in a dashboard cradle during a hands-free call.
In fact, many people use a headset with their cellphone in their pocket, often pressed tightly against their body. The GAO reports the possible risk of radiation under this scenario needs to be factored in to calculations of safe levels.
The FCC says it is already considering a review of the regulations and will now ask government health agencies for their input.
Meanwhile, a spokesman for the group representing cellphone networks said the industry welcomes any review of the regulations. (Source: bloomberg.com)
Most popular articles
- Which Processor is Better: Intel or AMD? - Explained
- How to Prevent Ransomware in 2018 - 10 Steps
- 5 Best Anti Ransomware Software Free
- How to Fix: Computer / Network Infected with Ransomware (10 Steps)
- How to Fix: Your Computer is Infected, Call This Number (Scam)
- Scammed by Informatico Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Smart PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by Right PC Experts? Here's What to Do
- Scammed by PC / Web Network Experts? Here's What to Do
- How to Fix: Windows Update Won't Update
- Explained: Do I need a VPN? Are VPNs Safe for Online Banking?
- Explained: VPN vs Proxy; What's the Difference?
- Explained: Difference Between VPN Server and VPN (Service)
- Forgot Password? How to: Reset Any Password: Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10
- How to: Use a Firewall to Block Full Screen Ads on Android
- Explained: Absolute Best way to Limit Data on Android
- Explained: Difference Between Dark Web, Deep Net, Darknet and More
- Explained: If I Reset Windows 10 will it Remove Malware?
My name is Dennis Faas and I am a senior systems administrator and IT technical analyst specializing in cyber crimes (sextortion / blackmail / tech support scams) with over 30 years experience; I also run this website! If you need technical assistance , I can help. Click here to email me now; optionally, you can review my resume here. You can also read how I can fix your computer over the Internet (also includes user reviews).
We are BBB Accredited
We are BBB accredited (A+ rating), celebrating 21 years of excellence! Click to view our rating on the BBB.